These oses don't supply a tty layer, which prevents us from using the
libvaxis tty. Eventually we can add in using stdout as a writer. For
now, we just don't pretty print there.
Add pretty printing to the +list-keybinds command. This is done by
bringing in a dependency on libvaxis to handle the styling. Pretty
printing happens automatically when printing to a tty, and can be
disabled either by redirecting output or using the flag `--plain`
The case where the split if fully opaque (`unfocused-split-opacity = 1.0`) should result in the overlay being fully transparent (`opacity: 0.0`).
This would be consistent with how this is implemented in the macos app:
dcc492f19b/macos/Sources/Ghostty/Ghostty.Config.swift (L302)
With a minimum contrast set, the colored glyphs that Powerline uses
would sometimes be set to white or black while the surrounding background
colors remain unchanged, breaking up contiguous colors on segments of
the Powerline.
This no longer happens with this patch as Powerline glyphs are now
special-cased and exempt from the minimum contrast adjustment.
The case when `quit-after-last-window-closed=true` and
`quit-after-last-window-closed-delay=null` was broken because control
gets stuck inside `g_main_context_iteration` and never returns to our
code. In that case add a 0ms timer that will return control flow from
GLib back to our code so that we can quit.
Fixes#2039
There are scenarios where this configuration looks bad. This commit
introduces some heuristics to prevent it. Here are the heuristics:
* Extension is always enabled on alt screen.
* Extension is disabled if a row contains any default bg color. The
thinking is that in this scenario, using the default bg color looks
just fine.
* Extension is disabled if a row is marked as a prompt (using semantic
prompt sequences). The thinking here is that prompts often contain
perfect fit glyphs such as Powerline glyphs and those look bad when
extended.
This introduces some CPU cost to the extension feature but it should be
minimal and respects dirty tracking. This is unfortunate but the feature
makes many terminal scenarios look much better and the performance cost
is minimal so I believe it is worth it.
Further heuristics are likely warranted but this should be a good
starting set.
Add `window-padding-top`, `window-padding-bottom`,
`window-padding-left`, and `window-padding-right` options. The
`window-padding-x` and `window-padding-y` options will override the
individual options.
