Closes#6703
Lazy dependencies are only fetched if the build script would actually
reach a usage of that dependency at runtime (when the `lazyDependency`
function is called). This can save a lot of network traffic, disk uage,
and time because we don't have to fetch and build dependencies that we
don't actually need.
Prior to this commit, Ghostty fetched almost everything for all
platforms and configurations all the time. This commit reverses that to
fetching almost nothing until it's actually needed.
There are very little downsides to doing this[1]. One downside is `zig
build --fetch` doesn't fetch lazy dependencies, but we don't rely on
this command for packaging and suggest using our custom shell script
that downloads a cached list of URLs (`build.zig.zon.txt`).
This commit doesn't cover 100% of dependencies, since some provide no
benefit to make lazy while the complexity to make them lazy is higher
(in code style typically).
Conversely, some simple dependencies are marked lazy even if they're
almost always needed if they don't introduce any real complexity to the
code, because there is very little downside to do so.
[1]: https://ziggit.dev/t/lazy-dependencies-best-dependencies/5509/5
Lazy dependencies are only fetched if the build script would actually
reach a usage of that dependency at runtime (when the `lazyDependency`
function is called). This can save a lot of network traffic, disk uage,
and time because we don't have to fetch and build dependencies that we
don't actually need.
Prior to this commit, Ghostty fetched almost everything for all
platforms and configurations all the time. This commit reverses that to
fetching almost nothing until it's actually needed.
There are very little downsides to doing this[1]. One downside is `zig
build --fetch` doesn't fetch lazy dependencies, but we don't rely on
this command for packaging and suggest using our custom shell script
that downloads a cached list of URLs (`build.zig.zon.txt`).
This commit doesn't cover 100% of dependencies, since some provide no
benefit to make lazy while the complexity to make them lazy is higher
(in code style typically).
Conversely, some simple dependencies are marked lazy even if they're
almost always needed if they don't introduce any real complexity to the
code, because there is very little downside to do so.
[1]: https://ziggit.dev/t/lazy-dependencies-best-dependencies/5509/5
Closes#6702
This removes our mach-glfw dependency and replaces it with an in-tree
pkg/glfw that includes both the source for compiling glfw as well as the
Zig bindings. This matches the pattern from our other packages.
This is based on the upstream mach-glfw work and therefore includes the
original license and copyright information.
The reasoning is stated in the issue but to summarize for the commit:
- mach-glfw is no longer maintained, so we have to take ownership
- mach-glfw depended on some large blobs of header files to enable
cross-compilation but this isn't something we actually care about, so we
can (and do) drop the blobs
- mach-glfw blobs were hosted on mach hosts. given mach-glfw is
unmaintained, we can't rely on this hosting
- mach-glfw relied on a "glfw" package which was owned by another person
to be Zig 0.14 compatible, but we no longer need to rely on this
- mach-glfw builds were outdated based on latest Zig practices
Closes#6702
This removes our mach-glfw dependency and replaces it with an in-tree
pkg/glfw that includes both the source for compiling glfw as well as the
Zig bindings. This matches the pattern from our other packages.
This is based on the upstream mach-glfw work and therefore includes the
original license and copyright information.
The reasoning is stated in the issue but to summarize for the commit:
- mach-glfw is no longer maintained, so we have to take ownership
- mach-glfw depended on some large blobs of header files to enable
cross-compilation but this isn't something we actually care about,
so we can (and do) drop the blobs
- mach-glfw blobs were hosted on mach hosts. given mach-glfw is
unmaintained, we can't rely on this hosting
- mach-glfw relied on a "glfw" package which was owned by another
person to be Zig 0.14 compatible, but we no longer need to rely on
this
- mach-glfw builds were outdated based on latest Zig practices
This PR adds a translation for German `de_DE`.
Additionally it excludes all `*.po` files from the typos CI action.
Some comments on the decisions I made (open to discuss them):
- I choosed to use `du` instead of `Sie` as this seems appropriate
to me.
- I added `Window` (`Fenster` in German) to all split commands
as it appears more naturally to me.
Closes#5744
This gets Ghostty onto Zig 0.14. The goal of this PR is to focus only on
Zig 0.14 _compatibility_. I plan to open a number of subsequent issues
for future improvements I'd like to tackle, as noted in #5744.
I did run some basic benchmarks on a Zig 0.13 vs 0.14 build and didn't
notice any statistically significant changes. All our scrolling
benchmarks on vtebench got consistently 1 or 2ms faster but that may
just be noise. The good news is nothing got consistently slower (nothing
got slower at all on any runs!).
The Git history here is kind of nasty, I'm going to squash it.
