Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870#8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#33017
Avatar should only have offset if the `Comment` has `Content` or
`Attachment` to align with the speech bubble.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. do not use `{{/* */}}` to remove spaces, use `{{- -}}`
2. fix "blob_excerpt" endpoint, remove the legacy fragile code: have
tested commit diff and wiki diff
Redesign the time tracker side bar, and add "time estimate" support (in "1d 2m" format)
Closes#23112
---------
Co-authored-by: stuzer05 <stuzer05@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Follow #32460
Now the code could be much clearer than before and easier to maintain. A
lot of legacy code is removed.
Manually tested.
This PR is large enough, that fine tunes could be deferred to the future if
there is no bug found or design problem.
Screenshots:
<details>
</details>
Use zero instead of 9999-12-31 for deadline
Fix#32291
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Follow #32383
This PR cleans up the "Deadline" usages in templates, make them call
`ParseLegacy` first to get a `Time` struct then display by `DateUtils`.
Now it should be pretty clear how "deadline string" works, it makes it
possible to do further refactoring and correcting.
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. There are already global "unit consts", no need to use context data, which is fragile
2. Remove the "String()" method from "unit", it would only cause rendering problems in templates
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
This PR introduces the `ReviewedOn` and `ReviewedBy` variables for the
default merge message templates (e.g.,
`.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md`).
This allows customizing the default merge messages while retaining these
trailers.
This also moves the associated logic out of `pull.tmpl` into the
relevant Go function.
This is a first contribution towards #11077.
---
For illustration, this allows to recreate the "default default" merge
message with the following template:
```
.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md
Merge pull request '${PullRequestTitle}' (${PullRequestReference}) from ${HeadBranch} into ${BaseBranch}
${ReviewedOn}
${ReviewedBy}
```
`overflow-wrap: anywhere` is a superior alternative to `word-wrap:
break-word` and we were already setting it in the class. I tested a few
cases, all look good.
Enable `no-sizzle` lint rule, there was only one use in `initCompReactionSelector` and:
- Remove all jQuery except the necessary fomantic dropdown init
- Remove the recursion, instead bind event listeners to common parent container nodes
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. Check whether the label is for an issue or a pull request.
2. Don't use space to layout
3. Make sure the test strings have trailing spaces explicitly, to avoid
some IDE removing the trailing spaces automatically.
Resolves#29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
We have to define this one in helpers.css because tailwind only
generates a single class but certain things rely on this being
double-class. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-hidden#tw-hidden#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* web_src/css/**/*
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945.
There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I
just ran below command and reverted that one instance.
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
```
