Conversion of #7497 to a PR. This implements a feature requested in
#7331: an option to hide the default window buttons on macOS for a
cleaner aesthetic.
~~Builds on #7502 as it requires the same change to avoid the main
toolbar title showing on top of the tab bar.~~ EDIT: rebased on main now
that #7502 was merged.
I aligned the scope of the new option with `macos-titlebar-style`, since
they both customize titlebar elements. This means it has the same edge
case quirks: For example, if you change the setting, reload the config,
and then open a new tab, the appearance of the current window will
depend on which tab is in the foreground. I did it this way because
`macos-titlebar-style` provided an easy template for which derived
configs and functions to modify. Let me know if you want me to try
adjusting this so that a change in the setting also takes effect for
current windows/tabs, which I _think_ should be possible.
Screenshots:
* `macos-titlebar-style = transparent` (default)


* `macos-titlebar-style = tabs`


This fixes a small memory leak I found where the `SplitNode.Leaf` was
not being deinitialized properly when closing a split. It would get
deinitialized the next time a split was made or the window was closed,
so the leak wasn't big. The surface view underneath the split was also
properly deinitialized because we forced it, so again, the leak was
quite small.
But conceptually this is a big problem, because when we change the
surface tree we expect the deinit chain to propagate properly through
the whole thing, _including_ to the SurfaceView.
This fixes that by removing the `id(node)` call. I don't find this to be
necessary anymore. I don't know when that happened but we've changed
quite a lot in our split system since it was introduced. I'm also not
100% sure why the `id(node)` was causing a strong reference to begin
with... which bothers me a bit.
AI note: While I manually hunted this down, I started up Claude Code and
Codex in separate tabs to also hunt for the memory leak. They both
failed to find it and offered solutions that didn't work.
Fixes#7236
Supersedes #7249
This removes all of our `focusedValue`-based tracking of the surface
title and moves it completely to the window controller. The window
controller now sets up event listeners (via Combine) when the focused
surface changes and updates the window title accordingly.
There is some complicated logic here to handle when we lose focus to
something other than a surface. In this case, we want our title to be
the last focused surface so long as it exists.
Fixes#6999
It appears that at some point one of the operations causes focus to move
away for non-native fullscreen. We previously relied on the delegate
method to restore this but a better approach appears to handle this
directly in the fullscreen implementations. This fixes the linked issue.
I still think long term all the `Ghostty.moveFocus` stuff is a code
smell and we should be auditing all that code to see if we can
eliminate it. But this is a step in the right direction, and removes one
of those uses.
This replaces the use of our custom `Ghostty.KeyEquivalent` with
the SwiftUI `KeyboardShortcut` type. This is a more standard way to
represent keyboard shortcuts and lets us more tightly integrate with
SwiftUI/AppKit when necessary over our custom type.
Note that not all Ghostty triggers can be represented as
KeyboardShortcut values because macOS itself does not support
binding keys such as function keys (e.g. F1-F12) to KeyboardShortcuts.
This isn't an issue since all input also passes through a lower level
libghostty API which can handle all key events, we just can't show these
keyboard shortcuts on things like the menu bar. This was already true
before this commit.
Fixes#5934 for macOS
If a `title` config is set, this change sets the title immediately on
windowDidLoad to ensure that the window appears with the correct title
right away.
If there is any reason to set another title, the `set_title` apprt
action will come on another event loop tick (due to our usage of
notifications) but that's okay since that's already how it works. This
is just to say that setting this here won't break any shell integration
or anything.
Related to #6035
This implements the keybind/action portion of #5974 so that this can
have a binding and so that other apprts can respond to this and
implement it this way.