This fixes a small memory leak I found where the `SplitNode.Leaf` was
not being deinitialized properly when closing a split. It would get
deinitialized the next time a split was made or the window was closed,
so the leak wasn't big. The surface view underneath the split was also
properly deinitialized because we forced it, so again, the leak was
quite small.
But conceptually this is a big problem, because when we change the
surface tree we expect the deinit chain to propagate properly through
the whole thing, _including_ to the SurfaceView.
This fixes that by removing the `id(node)` call. I don't find this to be
necessary anymore. I don't know when that happened but we've changed
quite a lot in our split system since it was introduced. I'm also not
100% sure why the `id(node)` was causing a strong reference to begin
with... which bothers me a bit.
AI note: While I manually hunted this down, I started up Claude Code and
Codex in separate tabs to also hunt for the memory leak. They both
failed to find it and offered solutions that didn't work.
Fixes#7236
Supersedes #7249
This removes all of our `focusedValue`-based tracking of the surface
title and moves it completely to the window controller. The window
controller now sets up event listeners (via Combine) when the focused
surface changes and updates the window title accordingly.
There is some complicated logic here to handle when we lose focus to
something other than a surface. In this case, we want our title to be
the last focused surface so long as it exists.
Allowing the alert to be automatically closed after the completion handler finishes doesn't seem to play well when the completion handler closes the window on which the alert is attached
Fixes#2900
It's possible for moveFocus to infinite loop if the surface view we're
trying to move focus to NEVER gets attached to a window. This can happen
if the window is destroyed.
I think this issue should be more systemically fixed so it can't happen
but this workaround for now prevents moveFocus from being an infinite
loop source for the time being.
macOS 12 is officially EOL by Apple and the project only supports
officially supported versions of macOS. Once publicly released, users on
older macOS versions will have to use older released builds.
First, this commit modifies libghostty to use a single unified action
dispatch system based on a tagged union versus the one-off callback
system that was previously in place. This change simplifies the code on
both the core and consumer sides of the library. Importantly, as we
introduce new actions, we can now maintain ABI compatibility so long as
our union size does not change (something I don't promise yet).
Second, this moves a lot more of the functions call on a surface into
the action system. This affects all apprts and continues the previous
work of introducing a more unified API for optional surface features.
This commit does two things: adds a weak reference to the parent
container of each SplitNode.Container and SplitNode.Leaf and moves the
"direction" of a split out of the SplitNode enum and into the
SplitNode.Container struct as a field.
Both changes are required for supporting split resizing. A reference to
the parent in each leaf and split container is needed in order to
traverse upwards through the split tree. If the focused split is not
part of a container that is split along the direction that was requested
to be resized, then we instead try and resize the parent. If the parent
is split along the requested direction, then it is resized
appropriately; otherwise, repeat until the root of the tree is reached.
The direction is needed inside the SplitNode.Container object itself so
that the container knows whether or not it is able to resize itself in
the direction requested by the user. Once the split direction was moved
inside of SplitNode.Container, it became redundant to also have it as
part of the SplitNode enum, so this simplifies things.
