Fixes#5927
This doesn't fix the underlying reason that GTK sometimes reports
content scales as negative. If GTK reports a negative scale, we ignore
that and use 1.0 for the scale.
See #5930
Kakoune sends a real SGR sequence with 17 parameters. Our previous max
was 16 so we threw away the entire sequence. This commit increases the
max rather than fundamentally addressing limitations.
Practically, it took us this long to witness a real world sequence that
exceeded our previous limit. We may need to revisit this in the future,
but this is an easy fix for now.
In the future, as the comment states in this diff, we should probably
look into a rare slow path where we heap allocate to accept up to some
larger size (but still would need a cap to avoid DoS). For now,
increasing to 24 slightly increases our memory usage but shouldn't
result in any real world issues.
This should resolve#5938.
I tested this locally using `zig build -D=emit-docs=true` and confirmed
that the mdgen process provided the new manpages in
`zig-out/share/man/man*`, respectively.
Let me know if this needs any changes, I tried to keep this as similar
as possible to the existing manpages (both format and content).
See #5930
Kakoune sends a real SGR sequence with 17 parameters. Our previous max
was 16 so we through away the entire sequence. This commit increases the
max rather than fundamentally addressing limitations.
Practically, it took us this long to witness a real world sequence that
exceeded our previous limit. We may need to revisit this in the future,
but this is an easy fix for now.
In the future, as the comment states in this diff, we should probably
look into a rare slow path where we heap allocate to accept up to some
larger size (but still would need a cap to avoid DoS). For now,
increasing to 24 slightly increases our memory usage but shouldn't
result in any real world issues.
This will be needed to the convert GTK apprt surfaces to a DerivedConfig
model rather than accessing the global config stored in the app. It's a
no-op for now, but I have a PR in the works to update the resize overlay
that will take advantage of this.
Menus (context menus and the window hamburger menu) now use popovers and
are defined using GTK builder UI files. This is a bit more "modern" and
reduces the amount of code to define menus.
## Root Cause
The issue has two aspects:
1. The window creation process didn't explicitly force focus on the new
window after showing it.
2. More fundamentally, we were relying on `NSApp.isActive` to determine
whether to activate the application, which is problematic because:
- When creating a window from quick terminal, the application is already
"active" but this active state is owned by the quick terminal
- The [`NSApp.isActive`
check](4cfe5522db/macos/Sources/Features/Terminal/TerminalManager.swift (L100))
doesn't accurately reflect our intent - creating a new window is an
explicit user action that should always result in that window gaining
focus
## Solution
Removing the `NSApp.isActive` check.
```swift
// Before
if !NSApp.isActive {
NSApp.activate(ignoringOtherApps: true)
}
// After
NSApp.activate(ignoringOtherApps: true)
```
Fixes#5688
Related to #3224
Previously, Ghostty used a static API for async event handling: io_uring
on Linux, kqueue on macOS. This commit changes the backend to be dynamic
on Linux so that epoll will be used if io_uring isn't available, or if
the user explicitly chooses it.
This introduces a new config `async-backend` (default "auto") which can
be set by the user to change the async backend in use. This is a
best-effort setting: if the user requests io_uring but it isn't
available, Ghostty will fall back to something that is and that choice
is up to us.
Basic benchmarking both in libxev and Ghostty (vtebench) show no
noticeable performance differences introducing the dynamic API, nor
choosing epoll over io_uring.
For platforms that don't have multiple choices (currently macOS), the
dynamic API is literally the static API so there should be no
performance or behavioral changes whatsoever.
