mirror of
https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty.git
synced 2025-07-15 08:16:13 +03:00
core: set focused surface pointer to null if matches on delete
We previously never set the focused pointer to null. I thought this would be fine because a `hasSurface` check would say it doesn't exist. But I didn't account for the fact that a deleted surface followed very quickly by a new surface would free the pointer, then the allocation would reuse the very same pointer, making `hasSurface` return a false positive. Well, technically, hasSurface is not wrong, the surface exists, but its not really the same surface, its just a surface that happens to have the same pointer as a previously freed surface. Co-authored-by: Will Pragnell <wpragnell@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
10
src/App.zig
10
src/App.zig
@ -139,6 +139,16 @@ pub fn addSurface(self: *App, rt_surface: *apprt.Surface) !void {
|
||||
/// Delete the surface from the known surface list. This will NOT call the
|
||||
/// destructor or free the memory.
|
||||
pub fn deleteSurface(self: *App, rt_surface: *apprt.Surface) void {
|
||||
// If this surface is the focused surface then we need to clear it.
|
||||
// There was a bug where we relied on hasSurface to return false and
|
||||
// just let focused surface be but the allocator was reusing addresses
|
||||
// after free and giving false positives, so we must clear it.
|
||||
if (self.focused_surface) |focused| {
|
||||
if (focused == &rt_surface.core_surface) {
|
||||
self.focused_surface = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var i: usize = 0;
|
||||
while (i < self.surfaces.items.len) {
|
||||
if (self.surfaces.items[i] == rt_surface) {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user