mirror of
https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty.git
synced 2025-07-14 15:56:13 +03:00
Update README.md
This commit is contained in:

committed by
GitHub

parent
27e42855ca
commit
095a299a16
36
README.md
36
README.md
@ -55,33 +55,49 @@ The high-level ambitious plan for the project, in order:
|
||||
| # | Step | Status |
|
||||
|:---:|------|:------:|
|
||||
| 1 | [Standards-compliant terminal emulation](docs/sequences.md) | ⚠️ |
|
||||
| 2 | Competitive rendering performance (not the fastest, but fast enough) | ✅ |
|
||||
| 2 | Competitive performance | ✅ |
|
||||
| 3 | Basic customizability -- fonts, bg colors, etc. | ✅ |
|
||||
| 4 | Richer windowing features -- multi-window, tabbing, panes | ⚠️ |
|
||||
| 5 | Native Platform Experiences (i.e. Mac Preference Panel) | ❌ |
|
||||
| 6 | Windows Terminals (including PowerShell, Cmd, WSL) | ❌ |
|
||||
| N | Fancy features (to be expanded upon later) | ❌ |
|
||||
|
||||
### Standards-Compliant Terminal Emulation
|
||||
Additional details for each step in the big roadmap below:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Standards-Compliant Terminal Emulation
|
||||
|
||||
I am able to use this terminal as a daily driver. I think that's good enough
|
||||
for a yellow status. There are a LOT of missing features for full standards
|
||||
compliance but the set that are regularly in use are working pretty well.
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Rendering Performance
|
||||
#### Competitive Performance
|
||||
|
||||
I want to benchmark this better, but we can maintain roughly 100fps under
|
||||
heavy load and 120fps generally. We have a multi-renderer architecture that
|
||||
uses OpenGL on Linux and Metal on macOS. As far as I'm aware, we're the only
|
||||
terminal emulator other than iTerm that uses Metal directly. And we're the
|
||||
only terminal emulator that has a Metal renderer that supports ligatures.
|
||||
We need better benchmarks to continuously verify this, but I believe at
|
||||
this stage Ghostty is already best-in-class (or at worst second in certain
|
||||
cases) for a majority of performance measuring scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Richer Windowing Features
|
||||
For rendering, we have a multi-renderer architecture that uses OpenGL on
|
||||
Linux and Metal on macOS. As far as I'm aware, we're the only terminal
|
||||
emulator other than iTerm that uses Metal directly. And we're the only
|
||||
terminal emulator that has a Metal renderer that supports ligatures (iTerm
|
||||
uses a CPU renderer if ligatures are enabled). We can maintain roughly
|
||||
100fps under heavy load and 120fps generally -- though the terminal is
|
||||
usually rendering much lower due to little screen changes.
|
||||
|
||||
For IO, we have a dedicated IO thread that maintains very little jitter
|
||||
under heavy IO load (i.e. `cat <big file>.txt`). On bechmarks for IO,
|
||||
we're usually top of the class by a large margin over popular terminal
|
||||
emulators. For example, reading a dump of plain text is 4x faster compared
|
||||
to iTerm and Kitty, and 2x faster than Terminal.app. Alacritty is very
|
||||
fast but we're still ~15% faster and our app experience is much more
|
||||
feature rich.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Richer Windowing Features
|
||||
|
||||
We support multi-window and tabbing on Mac. We will support panes/splits
|
||||
in the future and we'll continue to improve multi-window features.
|
||||
|
||||
### Native Platform Experiences
|
||||
#### Native Platform Experiences
|
||||
|
||||
Ghostty is a cross-platform terminal emulator but is meant to feel native
|
||||
on each platform it runs on. On macOS, this means having a preferences window
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user