Applied-Software/ZLUDA
5
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA.git synced 2025-04-25 02:48:56 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update README with links to GeekBench results

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Andrzej Janik
2020-11-23 22:37:57 +01:00
parent 690f4f3ad2
commit 892e47a653
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
README.md
View File

@ -9,9 +9,13 @@ One measurement has been done using OpenCL and another measurement has been done
Performance below is normalized to OpenCL performance. 110% means that ZLUDA-implemented CUDA is 10% faster on Intel UHD 630. Performance below is normalized to OpenCL performance. 110% means that ZLUDA-implemented CUDA is 10% faster on Intel UHD 630.
![](GeekBench_5_2_3.svg) ![Performance graph](GeekBench_5_2_3.svg)
Overall in this suite of benchmarks ZLUDA is roughly 4% faster. [ZLUDA detailed log on Geekbench.com](https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/1918048)
[OpenCL detailed log on Geekbench.com](https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/compute/1918080)
Overall in this suite of benchmarks faster by approximately 4% on ZLUDA.
### Explanation of the results ### Explanation of the results
* Why is ZLUDA faster in Stereo Matching, Gaussian Blur and Depth of Field?\ * Why is ZLUDA faster in Stereo Matching, Gaussian Blur and Depth of Field?\